next up previous contents
Next: Periodic orbitals Up: Quantum Monte Carlo on Previous: Quantum Monte Carlo on   Contents

Periodic Wave-Function

As far as the electron part is concerned, by applying the Bloch's theorem one finds that the eigen-functions for the Hamiltonian 4.1 can be written as:

$\displaystyle \Psi(\vec r_1,\vec r_2,...) = e^{-i\vec k \sum_i{\vec r_i}} \Phi (\vec r_1,\vec r_2,...),$ (4.2)

where $ \Phi (\vec r_1,\vec r_2,...)$ is a function invariant for translation of any electron coordinates by a vector $ \vec R_s$ , and $ \vec k$ is a vector in the first Brillouin Zone. Although better choices are possible, as Baldereschi's points, or using Twisted Boundary Conditions (76), in this preliminary work on solids we adopted the simplest choice $ \vec k=0$ . The correct thermodynamic limit, within the Bohr-Oppenaimer approximation, can be obviously reached for $ L\rightarrow \infty$ at fixed density $ \rho = N /L^3$ . In our simulations the distances are evaluated from the closest image of a given particle. One has to choose carefully an appropriate wave-function for a periodic system. In fact, as the minimal inter-particle distance switches from one image to another, there could be a discontinuity in the derivatives of the wave function. If this happen, the VMC energy can become lower than the true ground state one. This is due to the fact that the discontinuity leads to $ \delta$ functions that produce a finite positive contribution to the kinetic energy that however will be missed by the VMC sampling procedure, because it occurs in an irrelevant surface of the configuration space. In the past this problem has been solved by making use of different approaches: either by summing over all possible images by the Ewald sums or by requiring that the trial-function and its derivatives vanish at the surface of the sphere inscribed within the Wigner-Seitz cell (77). Instead in the present thesis we introduced a simple and more efficient approach by using periodic orbitals with the correct behavior at $ L/2$ without resorting the expensive evaluation of the Ewald sums.

Subsections
next up previous contents
Next: Periodic orbitals Up: Quantum Monte Carlo on Previous: Quantum Monte Carlo on   Contents
Claudio Attaccalite 2005-11-07